Based on personal experience, who first comes to mind most likely is the lens. The hope is, by replacing the built-in camera lens (kit lens), with other lenses with the built quality is better, we can obtain the images are "better". Why do I give the quotation marks? Better here once again is very relative, because it does not always apply where by replacing the default lens automatically and immediately we can get better results, because the photos are not just good or not depends on the equipment used, but also on a person's ability taking photos. And honestly, from personal experience too, though now there are L series lenses (17-40L) are stuck on my EOS 400D, that would still have some friends in the FN that result shots much nicer than I even just use the default lens 18 -55.
But despite it all, still in terms of image quality, color sharpness, and durability, L series lenses still had the upper hand than the kit lens. If not, why bother Canon issued a series of L product line with prices many times more expensive than non-L series lens? Of course you can answer it yourself right?
From left to right Lens Canon EF 17-40mm f / 4 L USM, Canon EF 24-105mm f / 4 L IS USM, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM and Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM
So, in order to achieve two objectives, you need to know is in the range where a general purpose lens it actually play? Of the few references that I read, general-purpose lens is basically a play on the range of lens focal lengths between 28mm -70 mm. This figure applies to full frame lens category (1 digit serial nation - 5D, 1D, etc.). For cameras that have a crop factor (Field of View Crop Factor) 1.3 x and 1.6 x, (series 2 digits, 3 digits, and 4 digits) will be shifted due to the choice cuts on the frame so that the effective number of 28mm - 70mm to be cut to about 17mm - 55mm. Well, the choice here, of course, somewhat complicated, because as we know, the output lens canon in this category only 1: Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM. Although not a line of L Series lenses, this lens is very expensive and even the same as the ranks of class L series lens Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM.
lens in a state at maximum zoom
Just now we narrow the discussion of this lens option only for the cameras with crop factor. Currently, the focal length between 17mm to 55mm can be obtained with the lens as follows:EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USMEF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USMEF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM,EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L,EF 24-105mm f / 4 L IS USMEF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMFor third party lenses, there is Tamron 17-50 and Sigma 17-70 Macro. However, this time I will not discuss the third party lenses because in addition have never tried to use or possess, however, first-party lenses are always guaranteed a more than third party.
From the sixth Canon lens above, the outline can be divided into 2: wide angle (17mm digit starts) and zoom (24mm digit starts.) From both these divisions, in fact we can still get the benefits of focal length for all susana, ranging from landscape to portrait photographs (almost all the atmosphere unless the macro). The selection is of course very important for us who like to travel, either back to nature or city tour. Every moment can be perpetuated by these two categories of this lens.
However, still we have to choose between them is not it? Except if we want to bring more than 1 lens while traveling. Well if it's like this we have to decide more or more often where we motret scenery with motret group photo, portraits, birthday parties etc.. If we take more photos with a wide-angle side, then the prefix 17mm is the most appropriate, yet in kisran 40-85mm, we can still get a range of focal lengths to photograph besides scenery. Currently, I use 17-40 as the choice of general purpose lens, though I still have to bring 55-250mm for telephoto lenas. Ideally 70-200 L lens is the most accurate but still not bought.
However, there is one option that may be able to represent all, but also can get exceptional quality. This option is the 24-70L lens. Due to this side of the wide angle lens can still be obtained, as well as with the zoom. The reason for the selection of these lens is image quality that many people say is very nice and sharp. But this lens has one weakness that is sometimes extremely avoided by those who like to travel with luggage conditions are very miniml. The weakness of this lens is: SEVERE
Just a note, we can only get a picture perfect almost be said of the lens with focal length range that is not too large. Never you expect to get a good picture quality of the lens 18-200mm sapujagad sorts. Indeed, its focal length is very large, but only at certain focal lengths only we could get a sharp picture quality. On the other focal length is usually generated images tend to be soft.
In terms of budget, 17-85mm lens can be an option compared to 17-40 or 17-55 though the picture quality can not be compared with the second lens. This lens can be said to represent both categories, wide angle can be obtained, tele-zoom can also be obtained at 85mm. If you want to take pictures of objects that is more than that, do not expect much, better to use a 70-200 lens and grab all objects in the 200m.
Apart from all that, the options keep coming back to you. Adjust to your needs and availability of funds. Make no mistake buying so as not on target.
From the sixth Canon lens above, the outline can be divided into 2: wide angle (17mm digit starts) and zoom (24mm digit starts.) From both these divisions, in fact we can still get the benefits of focal length for all susana, ranging from landscape to portrait photographs (almost all the atmosphere unless the macro). The selection is of course very important for us who like to travel, either back to nature or city tour. Every moment can be perpetuated by these two categories of this lens.
However, still we have to choose between them is not it? Except if we want to bring more than 1 lens while traveling. Well if it's like this we have to decide more or more often where we motret scenery with motret group photo, portraits, birthday parties etc.. If we take more photos with a wide-angle side, then the prefix 17mm is the most appropriate, yet in kisran 40-85mm, we can still get a range of focal lengths to photograph besides scenery. Currently, I use 17-40 as the choice of general purpose lens, though I still have to bring 55-250mm for telephoto lenas. Ideally 70-200 L lens is the most accurate but still not bought.
However, there is one option that may be able to represent all, but also can get exceptional quality. This option is the 24-70L lens. Due to this side of the wide angle lens can still be obtained, as well as with the zoom. The reason for the selection of these lens is image quality that many people say is very nice and sharp. But this lens has one weakness that is sometimes extremely avoided by those who like to travel with luggage conditions are very miniml. The weakness of this lens is: SEVERE
Just a note, we can only get a picture perfect almost be said of the lens with focal length range that is not too large. Never you expect to get a good picture quality of the lens 18-200mm sapujagad sorts. Indeed, its focal length is very large, but only at certain focal lengths only we could get a sharp picture quality. On the other focal length is usually generated images tend to be soft.
In terms of budget, 17-85mm lens can be an option compared to 17-40 or 17-55 though the picture quality can not be compared with the second lens. This lens can be said to represent both categories, wide angle can be obtained, tele-zoom can also be obtained at 85mm. If you want to take pictures of objects that is more than that, do not expect much, better to use a 70-200 lens and grab all objects in the 200m.
Apart from all that, the options keep coming back to you. Adjust to your needs and availability of funds. Make no mistake buying so as not on target.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar